Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
4
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
100%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£1,950
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
4
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 4
published decisions.
Reasonable redress2
Service failure2
Maladministration3
Mid Suffolk District Council's maladministration rate (100%) is higher than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (83%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of damp and mould. We have also investigated the landlord’s complaint handling.. Total compensation…
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord’s handling of REPORT COMPLAINT 202338776 Mid Suffolk District Council 29 January 2025 Our approach The Housing Ombudsman’s approach to investigating and determining…
The Ombudsman found service failure, maladministration, reasonable redress in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s handling of the resident’s: reports of multiple repairs to her property; associated complaint..
The Ombudsman found service failure, reasonable redress in the landlord’s handling of : The landlord’s handling of repairs carried out at the resident’s new property. The landlord’s handling of reports that contractors…
Monitor Mid Suffolk District Council and its peers
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.